Jeff Craddock’s cellphone rang, and on the other end of the Tarboro High School football coach’s line was Todd Gurley.
“I’m ready to come home,” Gurley told his former coach.
It was last November and Thanksgiving was days away. The Tarboro Vikings were preparing for a third-round playoff game. The Los Angeles Rams were coming off a thrilling victory over the Kansas City Chiefs on Monday Night Football, another check mark on their Super Bowl run.
“You don’t want to hang out in L.A.?” Craddock asked his former star running back. “You’re coming back home?”
“Coach, let me tell you something,” Gurley told Craddock. “I’m so ready to come back home right now I can’t stand it.”
On Sunday, as Gurley enters his fifth NFL season, he once again will return to North Carolina, only this time it will be to play his first professional football game there. It will be a welcome place for him to kick off the 2019 season, after the 25-year-old arguably endured the most trying offseason of his professional career.
It’s the place where he feels at home.
Even so, Gurley’s desire to return to Tarboro during the Rams’ bye week last season came as something of a surprise to his high school coach, not because Gurley doesn’t often return to the small Edgecombe County town.
But before the season, Gurley signed a record-breaking, four-year, $60 million extension, with $45 million guaranteed. The Rams were on a 10-1 stretch run and the bye week potentially offered Gurley an opportunity to kick back and continue to live his real-life rags-to-riches dream in Hollywood, far from where he grew up in the Lone Pine Mobile Home Park.
After Gurley told Craddock the reason he wanted to visit, Craddock understood why.
“I think sometimes the bright lights and him being known wherever he goes and he looks forward to just coming back to Tarboro, where you don’t got to fight cameras, you don’t got to answer questions. He can just come to where he practiced and just watch the guys practice and just be himself,” Craddock said. “Not be portrayed as some big superstar, just Todd hanging out.”
Since he was selected with the 10th overall pick in the 2015 draft, Gurley has continued to return to Tarboro to check in on those closest to him, deliver free turkey dinners, host free football camps for kids and even grab a cheese biscuit at Abrams, a local favorite.
Many of the people who have continued to welcome Gurley home will be in attendance Sunday at Bank of America Stadium in Charlotte — or at least will be watching from 240 miles away in Tarboro — when the Rams play the Carolina Panthers.
“I’m excited,” Gurley said. “Never really went to Charlotte growing up, but it will be cool just to be able to go back to North Carolina to be able to play in front of family and friends.”
For nine months, Gurley — and his teammates — have been bombarded with endless questions about the health of his left knee after an inauspicious ending last season.
Sunday will be Gurley’s first chance to prove he still is the same back who was named the NFL’s Offensive Player of the Year for 2017 and who last season rushed for 1,251 yards and scored a league-best 21 touchdowns.
There have been reports that he is suffering from arthritis or has a degenerative condition. None of those reports has been confirmed by Gurley or the Rams.
“It’s fine,” Gurley said Thursday when asked about his knee. “Just Week 1 now — I’m here.”
Gurley sat out the final two regular-season games last season because of soreness and inflammation in the knee, which was surgically reconstructed after he tore the ACL as a junior at the University of Georgia. He returned during a 30-22 divisional-round win against the Dallas Cowboys, rushing for 115 yards and a touchdown.
But in the NFC Championship Game and Super Bowl LIII, the three-time Pro Bowl player vanished. Gurley had five touches for 13 yards against the New Orleans Saints and spent much of the game watching from the sideline. In the Super Bowl, he rushed for 35 yards on 10 carries in a 13-3 loss to the New England Patriots.
Rams coach Sean McVay repeatedly has shouldered the blame for failing to get his star back into a rhythm in both instances. The Rams and Gurley have maintained that his health is fine.
But the offseason continued to raise flags about Gurley’s health.
The Rams matched the Detroit Lions‘ two-year, $3.3 million offer sheet to keep trusted backup running back Malcolm Brown. They selected running back Darrell Henderson from Memphis in the third round with their second overall draft pick.
Gurley did not participate in the offseason program, but he worked out with his personal trainer. He was an every-other-day participant during training camp. Along with the rest of the starters and several key reserves, including Brown, Gurley did not play in any preseason games.
McVay said Thursday that Gurley will not be on a limited snap count in his season debut.
“I’m excited to see Todd Gurley continue to do his thing,” McVay said. “He looks good, he’s feeling good and we’re looking forward to Sunday.”
Gurley said he was not eager to show everyone that his knee is fine.
“It’s football, bro,” Gurley said. “Been playing it my whole life. It’s just another season.”
But undoubtedly, the questions have grown tiresome to the All-Pro back, who resorts to shrugging his shoulders and keeping his responses to a minimum.
Whether Gurley will acknowledge it, at long last the opportunity to silence the questions, even if only momentarily, will come in North Carolina — the same place he visits to find familiarity, to be treated like Todd Gurley the person rather than a fantasy football linchpin or L.A. Rams star.
Typically, when Gurley returns to North Carolina, he has nothing to prove.
That isn’t the case on Sunday.
DE Ansah cleared for Seahawks debut Sunday
According to Pete Carroll, the one-time Pro Bowl pass-rusher is expected to play extensively Sunday against the visiting New Orleans Saints.
“Ziggy’s ready to play, ready to play football,” Carroll said Friday. “So we’re excited to see that. It’s been a really good process to get him to this, where he’s in good shape, too. He’s worked hard and long, so he’s in better shape than sometimes when a guy is just coming back. So we’ll be able to get him a bunch of plays here in this game and look forward to his participation with us.”
Ansah signed with the Seahawks in May after having surgery to repair a shoulder injury that cut short his final season with the Lions. He appeared to be on track to play in the Seahawks’ Sept. 8 opener after returning to practice 12 days before. It was thus somewhat of a surprise when he was inactive for the first two games.
Carroll never fully committed to Ansah playing in Week 1 against the Cincinnati Bengals or last weekend against the Pittsburgh Steelers, giving his usual qualifiers ahead of time about needing to make sure that Ansah felt OK on game day. He gave no such qualifiers Friday.
“We took a shot at it,” Carroll said of Ansah returning in time for the opener. “He made it back to practice for Week 1 in time to do that, but we just felt like it would be better to continue to build his confidence in his return and all of that and just wait it out to secure the return. So hopefully that’s what happens.”
Ansah, 30, echoed Carroll’s remarks about long-term thinking with his health.
“I think we all got to understand that it’s a marathon and not a sprint,” Ansah said. “If I was good enough, I would be on the field.”
The Seahawks list three players as questionable for Sunday: safety Tedric Thompson, cornerback Tre Flowers and running back Rashaad Penny, who was a late addition to their injury report after hurting his hamstring late in Friday’s practice. Flowers turned his ankle Thursday and will be a game-time decision along with Thompson, who missed the Steelers game with a hamstring injury.
With cornerback Neiko Thorpe listed as doubtful with a hamstring injury, Akeem King or Jamar Taylor would step in for Flowers at right cornerback if need be. Lano Hill started last weekend in Thompson’s absence. Carroll said he wouldn’t hesitate to give C.J. Prosise snaps behind Chris Carson if Penny can’t play.
The Seahawks expect to have receiver David Moore back from the shoulder injury that kept him out of the first two games. Defensive tackle Poona Ford will also return after missing the Pittsburgh game with a calf injury. Right guard D.J. Fluker was a full participant Friday and was not listed with any game designation, meaning he’s expected to play despite an ankle injury.
The Seahawks listed Ansah as a full participant in all three practices this week. Carroll said he’ll wear some sort of device on his surgically repaired shoulder, though he didn’t specify that it was a harness.
Ansah said his conditioning feels “great” and added that before he began practicing, “it’s all I did, run around all day every day.”
The Seahawks signed Ansah after trading Frank Clark, who had played the weakside end spot known as the “Leo” in Carroll’s defense. Ansah pivoted away from a question about whether his role in Seattle’s defense differs from what he did in Detroit.
“Detroit is the past,” he said. “I’m just looking forward to what we can do with this team collectively. So far so good. You can see the production we’ve been putting on the field and I’m just excited to be a part of that.”
As for playing opposite another Pro Bowler in Jadeveon Clowney for the first time Sunday?
“I’m super excited to play with him,” Ansah said. “He’s a great guy off the field, and we all know what he can do on the field.”
Said Carroll: “I couldn’t be more excited to see these guys play together and get going. JD’s just getting started, too. It’s pretty fun. Can’t wait to see what it looks like.”
The one-year deal Ansah signed with Seattle includes a base value of $9 million and has $1.5 million available in roster bonuses tied to being active on game day. That means he lost out on two bonuses worth $93,750 apiece by being inactive the first two weeks. But he also made that same amount in per-game bonuses that are tied to being on the 53-man roster. Ansah can make another $4.25 million in incentives.
Carroll’s Friday afternoon media session was held minutes after news broke that the Patriots were releasing Antonio Brown. He was asked if the Seahawks would look into Brown, having spoken with him before he signed with New England.
“We’re pretty well set right now,” Carroll said. “We kinda know where we’re going with that.”
Artist says Antonio Brown sent ‘intimidating’ texts
The lawyer for a woman who earlier this week alleged sexual misconduct by Antonio Brown reached out to the NFL on Thursday night after the wide receiver apparently sent what were described as threatening text messages to her client, Sports Illustrated reports.
Attorney Lisa J. Banks wrote the NFL, asking the league to stop alleged conduct by Brown that she deemed as “intimidating and threatening to our client, in violation of the NFL Personal Conduct Policy,” according to the report. The NFL responded quickly, setting up a phone call between league investigators and the woman’s attorneys.
The woman told SI that, on Wednesday night, she received a group text message that appeared to come from the same phone number Brown gave to her in 2017, when she was hired by the wide receiver to paint a mural in his suburban Pittsburgh home. The text chain had four other numbers on it, SI reported.
The woman said she believes Brown was encouraging others in the group to investigate her, describing her as a “super broke girl” and asking someone he refers to as “Eric B” to “look up her background history.” He then sent a screenshot of an Instagram photo she had posted showing the faces of her young children, adding “those her kids … she’s awful broke clearly.”
The texter accused the woman of fabricating her account of a 2017 incident for cash.
The text messages, sent while Brown was a member of New England Patriots, were viewed by some in the organization to have crossed the line, a source told ESPN on Friday, shortly after the Patriots released the embattled wide receiver less than two weeks after signing him.
“The NFL and the Patriots clearly took our client’s concerns seriously,” Banks and law firm partner Debra Katz said in a statement Friday. “She wanted the threats and intimidation to stop and we hope that will be the case. The NFL has assured us that regardless of Antonio Brown’s roster status, it will continue to investigate all claims regarding his behavior.We are gratified that the NFL recognized that it has an important role to play in policing player conduct that is sexually harassing and threatening.”
The woman’s allegations were first included within a Sports Illustrated story published Monday that detailed multiple domestic incidents involving Brown.
According to SI’s initial report, Brown had hosted a charity softball game in Pittsburgh to benefit the National Youth Foundation, a Pennsylvania-based volunteer group of women that promotes inclusion and gender equality, as well as developing academic skills in kids. The event had an auction that included artwork, and Brown agreed to purchase a portrait of himself before befriending the artist who created it.
Brown invited the artist to come to his home to create another painting of him, according to the report, arranging for transportation from New York to western Pennsylvania. The artist told SI she was thrilled by Brown’s willingness to share her work on social media, but on her second day in Pennsylvania, things changed.
According to the report, which did not include the artist’s name, she “was in a kneeling position while painting and turned to find Brown behind her, naked, holding a small hand towel over his genitals.” The artist said she didn’t stop painting and that “after that, it all ended abruptly.”
Brown paid her $2,000 for the mural, according to SI, and didn’t contact the artist thereafter.
The artist is not pursuing charges or remuneration, according to SI.
After SI published its story Monday, Brown’s attorney, Darren Heitner, tweeted that his client denied he ever acted inappropriately.
Heitner told SI he had not advised Brown to communicate with the woman but otherwise declined comment when reached Thursday.
Messages sent by SI to Brown’s agent, Drew Rosenhaus, were not immediately returned Thursday, according to the report.
The woman’s allegations are separate from those of Britney Taylor, Brown’s former trainer who filed a civil suit in Florida earlier this month. In the lawsuit, she alleges that Brown sexually assaulted her in three separate incidents, two in June 2017 and another in May 2018.
NFL investigators met with Taylor on Monday, and a source previously told ESPN that there are “more interviews and information gathering being conducted now beyond Taylor.” It remains unclear when or if Brown will interview with the league.
Brown, who was signed by the Patriots on Sept. 9 — before Taylor’s lawsuit was filed — and made his season debut Sunday against the Miami Dolphins, spoke publicly Thursday for the first time since the allegations came out. During the brief media session, Brown was not directly asked a question about his reaction to Taylor’s lawsuit and deflected a question on whether he has heard from the NFL about being able to play throughout the 2019 season.
What now for Antonio Brown? Answering the biggest questions around his release
Antonio Brown has been released by his second NFL team in less than two weeks. The New England Patriots announced Friday that they were parting ways with the star wide receiver, whom they signed when he was released by the Oakland Raiders just before Week 1.
Brown has been publicly accused of sexual misconduct by two different women in the time since the Patriots signed him, and once new allegations of his behavior toward one of those women surfaced overnight Thursday, the Patriots decided they’d had enough.
It has been a bizarre saga for Brown since he forced his way out of Pittsburgh via trade during the offseason. His time with the Raiders was marked by controversy over his preferred choice of helmet, the accidental freezing of his feet in a cryotherapy chamber and a public feud with team management over fines for missing work. The Patriots agreed to terms with him hours after his release from Oakland on Sept. 7, but it wasn’t long before far more serious controversies began to surface.
Brown is under NFL investigation and without a job. Here’s a look at some of the key facts of the situation as it stands:
Why did the Patriots cut him now?
The Patriots claim that they did not know, when they signed Brown on Sept. 9, that his former trainer Britney Taylor was planning to file a lawsuit against him alleging sexual assault. She did that three days later, but New England kept him on the team last week, and he played in their victory over the Miami Dolphins.
This week, a Sports Illustrated story was published that included a fresh allegation of sexual misconduct against Brown by a different woman. That woman told Sports Illustrated on Thursday that Brown had sent her intimidating and threatening texts after the story ran, and her attorneys said Thursday they were sharing those texts and that information with league investigators. The Patriots woke up to that news Friday morning and, according to sources, held a series of meetings to determine the best course of action in light of the most recent development and all of the issues that were piling up around Brown.
Coach Bill Belichick, who has control over the composition of the team’s roster, walked out of his regular Friday news conference because he didn’t want to answer questions about Brown and the reporters who cover the team understandably kept asking them anyway. Several hours later, the Patriots released a short statement that read, “The New England Patriots are releasing Antonio Brown. We appreciate the hard work of many people over the last 11 days, but we feel that it is best to move in a different direction at this time.”
Will the NFL take action against him, too?
The NFL’s investigation into Brown’s off-field conduct began Monday when league investigators interviewed Taylor, who filed the lawsuit last week accusing Brown of sexual assault. That investigation, a league source said Friday after Brown’s release, “will continue.” The league has been interviewing other witnesses besides Taylor this week and has been gathering information on all of the accusations against Brown. At this time, the league is not scheduled to interview Brown. Usually, the interview with the player happens at the end of the investigation, after the league has compiled all of its evidence against him.
Often, the NFL will place a player who is under investigation on the commissioner’s exempt list, which keeps him off the field but still allows him to be paid while the investigation is completed. But a league source said Friday that a player must be signed to a team in order to be placed on the commissioner’s exempt list, which means Brown will not be placed on that list unless another team signs him.
Will he end up being suspended?
In order to know that, we’d have to know more about the league’s findings so far and what they’ll find as they continue their investigation.
Could he serve the suspension while not signed by a team?
Yes, if Brown were to be suspended, he could technically serve the suspension while he was a free agent.
Let’s say, for example, the league decided to suspend him eight games (literally just speculation here, just picking a figure out of the air), and the decision came down today (which it won’t). He’d be suspended for the next eight weeks, meaning he’d be eligible to play in Week 11, even if he didn’t sign with another team until a month from now.
Mike Reiss reports that the decision to release Antonio Brown was a decision that Bill Belichick and Robert Kraft made together.
Could another team sign him? And will one?
Brown is a free agent and can sign with any team. There’s no way to predict or account for the actions of all 32 teams. Realistically, though, any team that signs Brown would almost certainly want to wait until the investigation into him is completed and it knows what discipline, if any, he would be facing.
We can’t rule it out, but it would be very surprising if a team signed him while the NFL’s investigation was still ongoing.
How much money did this whole thing cost the Patriots?
That’s going to be a matter for arbitrators and courts. The one-year contract Brown signed with the Patriots on Sept. 9 included a $9 million signing bonus and $1 million in fully guaranteed 2019 salary. If a player is on the roster at 4 p.m. ET on Tuesday, he gets paid for that week, so the Patriots technically would have paid him two game checks worth $62,500 (one-sixteenth of $1 million) each. So he earned $125,000 in salary — plus a $33,333 per-game roster bonus for the one game he played — for his time there. Now, the salary was guaranteed, but the Patriots can easily argue that the circumstances that led to his release voided those guarantees and that they don’t have to pay them.
The signing bonus is trickier, since NFL contract language that voids guaranteed salary doesn’t automatically find a player in default of his signing bonus. Technically, the Patriots haven’t paid any of it yet. The first $5 million was due this coming Monday, Sept. 23, and the remaining $4 million was deferred until Jan. 15, 2020.
New England likely won’t want to pay any of that signing bonus, and a league source said the team’s way out of it is a representation warranty clause that says it’s a breach of contract if Brown didn’t disclose an existing situation that would have prevented his continued availability (i.e., if he knew about Taylor’s pending lawsuit and didn’t tell the team before he signed with them). Another source said the NFL Players Association (NFLPA) considers a signing bonus “money earned,” regardless of the payment schedule, so any attempt by the Patriots to avoid paying the signing bonus money likely would result in a grievance by Brown and the union.
Part of the NFLPA’s job is to push back on teams’ attempts to get out of contracts, so any team action that would potentially set a precedent of not paying signing bonus money would likely result in a fight between the union and the league and/or team. The Raiders, as a general rule, don’t include signing bonus money in their deals, and Brown’s was not the exception. So the their attempts to void guaranteed salary and recoup the money they spent on him would be less likely to incur a grievance than would the Patriots’ effort to escape signing bonus payments.
Ryan Clark says he isn’t surprised by Antonio Brown’s release from the Patriots as they aim to maintain chemistry within the locker room.
And how about in salary-cap charges?
Since Brown was released after June 1, the Patriots can split the charge for the signing bonus over the next two years. Add in the $1 million salary for this year, and New England’s cap charges for Brown would be $5.75 million in 2019 and $4.75 million in 2020. If the team was able to successfully fight to get all of the salary and bonus money back, it would get back this year’s $5.75 million as a salary-cap credit in 2020, and the $4.75 million charge for next year would be wiped away.
But let’s step back for a second and realize that there are currently three NFL teams carrying dead-money salary cap charges for Brown in 2019: The Pittsburgh Steelers, who traded him to the Raiders in the spring, are carrying a $21.12 million dead-money charge on their cap for Brown, and the Raiders are carrying a $1,193,627 dead-money charge this year and another $666,667 next year.
Brown was on Oakland’s roster as of 4 p.m. ET the Tuesday before the Raiders’ Week 1 game, so they’re technically on the hook for $860,294 in salary (one-seventeenth of the $14.625 million they were scheduled to pay him in 2019). The rest of the dead money in Oakland is the result of workout bonuses treated as signing bonus for cap purposes. Like the Patriots, the Raiders can (and will) fight to get their money back, and if they do they’ll get cap credits for it in 2020.
Is Brown entitled to termination pay?
He could be. NFL rules allow a player, once in his career, to file for and collect termination pay if he’s released by a team. If the player is on that team’s roster Week 1, he’s entitled to 100 percent of his base salary in termination pay. If he’s not on the roster Week 1, he’s entitled to 25 percent of his base salary in termination pay.
Brown was not, technically, on any team’s Week 1 roster, since he was released by the Raiders before 4 p.m. ET on the day before the season’s first Sunday and not officially signed by the Patriots until two days later. He would technically be entitled to $250,000 (25 percent of $1 million) in termination pay if he wanted to pursue that. But as with the guaranteed salary, it’s all up in the air because of extenuating off-field circumstances that could affect Brown’s right to any of his money at all.
Football news: Cristiano Ronaldo, Real Madrid, Juventus, Manchester United, Champions League
Extensions give Marlins stability, Mattingly says
Der v Ess: Second semi-final match-ups
DE Ansah cleared for Seahawks debut Sunday
CC to bullpen; Yanks envision 'significant role'
Artist says Antonio Brown sent ‘intimidating’ texts
Yanks’ Sabathia to be used in relief in final week
Champions League: Gareth Bale, Real Madrid, video, watch, Zinedine Zidane, PSG
Not v Wor: First semi-final match-ups
What now for Antonio Brown? Answering the biggest questions around his release
Motorsport3 days ago
F1 news 2019, F1 yellow card, Charles Leclerc, Lewis Hamilton
NFL7 days ago
Kyler Murray and Lamar Jackson: Pass-first dual-threat QBs – Arizona Cardinals Blog
NFL2 days ago
Raiders’ Richie Incognito ready to move forward after suspension – Oakland Raiders Blog
NFL5 days ago
Rams move past botched PI call in win over Saints, but not without controversy – Los Angeles Rams Blog
NFL3 days ago
Patriots’ D could match 1937 Bears by holding Jets without a TD – New England Patriots Blog
NFL5 days ago
Russell Wilson-Will Dissly connection helps Seahawks win ugly again – Seattle Seahawks Blog
NFL4 days ago
What Steelers’ offense looks like with ‘mad man’ QB Mason Rudolph – Pittsburgh Steelers Blog
NFL4 days ago
Steelers’ move for Minkah Fitzpatrick bold, calculated — and a bit desperate – Pittsburgh Steelers Blog