Connect with us


Recent Match Report – India vs Pakistan, World Cup, 22nd match



India 336 for 5 (Rohit 140, Kohli 77, Rahul 57, Amir 3-47) beat Pakistan 212 for 6 (Fakhar 62, Kuldeep 2-32) by 89 runs by the DSL method
As it happened

Seven-nil. On its biggest stage, cricket’s most fraught rivalry really hasn’t lived up to its billing.

None of the six previous World Cup meetings between India and Pakistan produced anything approaching a tight finish, but most of them contained tense passages of play and moments of crackling electricity. Sunday at Old Trafford had none of that. There was plenty of quality cricket, but nearly all of it was from one side. The other side was a shadow, not just of what it had been in the past, but even of what it had been two weeks ago.

Pakistan barely showed up, and the contest turned into an uninterrupted celebration of Indian excellence.

Watch on Hotstar (India only)Full highlights of the match

Rohit Sharma scored his second hundred in three games, a far breezier knock than his effort in a scrappy chase against South Africa, and at one stage he seemed set for a tilt at a fourth ODI double-hundred. KL Rahul, batting in his preferred position thanks to the enforced absence of Shikhar Dhawan, made a solid half-century in an opening stand of 136. Virat Kohli came to the crease, occupied it like a favourite bit of lawn furniture, and made 77 at comfortably over a run a ball without ever seeming to stretch himself.

These efforts set Pakistan a target of 337. This was a flat pitch, and India lost one of their two main fast bowlers, Bhuvneshwar Kumar, to hamstring stiffness after he had delivered just 1.4 overs, leaving the fifth and sixth bowlers 18.2 overs, rather than just 10, to handle. And yet, apart from a brief period during a 104-run second-wicket stand between Fakhar Zaman and Babar Azam, Pakistan never threatened to make a chase of it.

The Fakhar-Babar partnership only rarely hit high gear, partly because of the discipline from India’s bowlers – even Vijay Shankar and Hardik Pandya – and partly because Pakistan were looking to keep wickets in hand, perhaps with an eye on staying close to the DLS par score, given that rain had already caused a couple of brief interruptions.

A series of authoritative slog-sweeps from both batsmen brought Pakistan 26 runs from overs 21 to 23, one of them bringing up Fakhar’s half-century. At the 23-over mark, Pakistan were 113 for 1, 11 behind the DLS par score of 124 for 1.

That was as close as they got, as Kuldeep Yadav put India firmly on top once more with the wickets of both set batsmen. They didn’t arrive out of the blue; Kuldeep was consistently challenging the batsmen in the air and off the pitch, and he had already come close to having Fakhar stumped, ripping one across his bat face and causing him to overbalance.

The breakthrough arrived in the 24th over, courtesy a cocktail of drift, dip and turn. Drift drew Babar into playing at a wider line as Kuldeep floated one across him from left-arm over, opening a gap between bat and pad. Dip ensured the ball landed shorter than Babar wanted, causing him to push further out in front of his body than he would have wanted. Turn did the rest.

Dip forced Fakhar to top-edge a sweep in Kuldeep’s next over, and Pakistan were 126 for 3. When Pandya followed up in the next over with the back-to-back wickets of Mohammad Hafeez and the dreadfully out-of-sorts Shoaib Malik, the contest was all but over.

The game dragged on for a while longer, though, thanks to a 40-minute spell of rain that shaved 10 overs off the chase. When play resumed, Pakistan needed 130 in 30 balls, with four wickets in hand, in front of stands that had gone two-thirds empty. It was the tired and farcical end that this contest – hyped to absurd levels for months and painted in dangerously jingoistic shades – probably deserved.

The match was probably won and lost in its first ten overs, when Pakistan chose to bowl in overcast conditions and failed to make use of them. Unlike most of the grounds at this World Cup, Old Trafford has long straight boundaries and short square ones, and with the clouds massed overhead it was the one place at which to bowl a fuller length. Barring Mohammad Amir, none of Pakistan’s fast bowlers did this.

The quicks bowled nine of the first 10 overs for Pakistan, and of the 54 balls they sent down, 30 were pitched either short or short of a length, according to ESPNcricinfo’s data. Rohit and Rahul scored 35 off those 30 balls, with Rohit in especially punishing mood with his square-cut and his range of pulls. The other 24 balls, mostly from Amir, were pitched on a good length or fuller, and off those balls India only scored 13 runs.

In comparison, India’s seamers bowled 36 balls on the fuller lengths in their first Powerplay, conceding 18 runs, and 24 on the shorter lengths, conceding 17.

Rohit usually starts sedately in ODIs and beds in for the long haul, accelerating gradually through his innings. Pakistan’s freebies had allowed him to begin in much more of a hurry now. At the 10-over mark he was on 37 off 29 balls, and a drive to the cover point boundary off Shadab Khan in the 12th over brought up his fifty off 34 balls. It was his quickest in ODIs.

The pace of Rohit’s scoring allowed Rahul to play at his own pace at the other end, and ease into a role he hasn’t really played too much of in his ODI career so far. Having moved to 14 off 31 at the 10-over mark, he accelerated when the spinners came on, bringing out his sweep, square cut, and lofted hits with a full extension of the arms. In all, he scored 12 off 30 against the faster bowlers and 45 off 48 against the spinners.

When Rahul spooned Wahab Riaz to short cover in the 24th over, India had already laid the base for a massive total. Rohit and Kohli, masters of pressing home advantageous situations, did what they do best, putting on 104 runs of increasing inevitability in 19.1 overs. Rohit brought up his century – his third-quickest in ODIs – off 85 balls, off the last ball of the 30th over, and proceeded to add 40 more to his score off his next 27 balls. Another double-century seemed to be his for the taking, but right after he had hammered Hasan Ali for a typically Rohit boundary – a mighty pull over mid-on – he fell playing an entirely atypical shot, shuffling across and scooping to short fine leg.

India came into the World Cup with questions over their No. 4, but through the tournament they’ve found a solution by taking so long to lose their second wicket that they can promote Pandya. They did so again, and he clattered 26 off 19, but there wasn’t really a proper end-overs explosion to follow his dismissal, as Amir’s angle and changes of pace tied down India’s lower middle order. India only made 38 off their last five overs, but by then they already had more than enough.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


England still in limbo as New Zealand series provides inconclusive Test reboot



What, in all honesty, have England learnt from their two-Test stopover in New Zealand? In one sense, it was a trip that lived down to its pre-series expectations, as a superbly well-drilled home team handed out a succession of lessons to a side that has neglected the longer format for several years now, and was unsurprisingly found wanting when those rusty attributes were suddenly called upon.

But on the other hand, it was a missed opportunity, not so much in terms of the scoreline – England haven’t won a single Test match in New Zealand since 2008, let alone an entire series – but in terms of how, and to whom, those lessons were handed out. With an arduous series in South Africa looming, the past month has served more as an exercise in confirmation bias rather than a Test reboot, leaving England no closer to answering their eternal selection issues than they were at the end of the home summer.

With the possible exceptions of Ollie Pope with the bat and Chris Woakes with the ball, no player in the course of the two Tests performed much better than the baseline of their pre-series expectations – a state of affairs which arguably reflects well on the three batsmen, Joe Root, Rory Burns and Ben Stokes, who arrived in the country with their places in the side secure and who duly topped the averages.

Unfortunately, the steady returns of those three (or in Root’s case, his dramatic upturn in form from first Test to second) were offset by the fact that more than a few of England’s squad members performed distinctly worse than anticipated. With the South Africa Test squad being announced on Saturday, we take a look at the movers and shakers in England’s brave new Test world.

Genuine progress

Ollie Pope (110 runs at 36.66)

Forget his absurd dalliance with the wicketkeeping gloves (honestly, of all the cupboards that England should find bare, when did that one get emptied?), Pope’s display of doughtiness in the second innings at Hamilton was the single biggest discovery of the series. Admittedly, it came on the flattest deck in humanity, so it would be advisable to curb the enthusiasm just a touch. Nevertheless, it was the performance that England needed to revive any hope of a series-squaring win, and the chance to spend the best part of two sessions watching and learning from England’s modern master, Joe Root, will have been invaluable.

Chris Woakes (4 wkts at 23.75)

There were some seriously slim pickings on the bowling front for England, as their haul of 20 wickets across two Tests amounted to their worst collective strike-rate in Test history. But Woakes was a relative revelation, albeit from a similarly low base. His self-confessed “surprise” at earning a recall in Hamilton was reflective of a pretty terrible overseas record – just 18 wickets at 61.77 in 12 previous Tests. But, by focusing on a relentless line and length and accepting any lateral movement as a bonus, Woakes was able to emulate the “bowling dry” tactics that James Anderson and, before him, Matthew Hoggard espoused when out of their comfort zones. And when he did finally nip one off the seam, he was already in the right areas for Tom Latham to nick to slip.

Marginal gains

Sam Curran (6 wkts at 39.66, 40 runs at 40.00)

The jury is still out on what, exactly, Curran brings to this England team, besides bucket-loads of competitive spirit (which is not a trait to be under-valued) and an unconventional line of attack. His pace is pop-gun, and his bouncer brings to mind Dominic Cork’s, in that it looks innocuous but is often well-enough directed to trouble batsmen who ought to know better. But when armed with the new ball, he extracted as much movement as any player on either side, and thanks to a brace of not-outs with the bat, his allround attributes had been enhanced by the end of the tour too. Vernon Philander is living proof that there is a place for medium-pace in South Africa. But Curran’s yo-yo selection record shows no sign of an early end.

Joe Denly (113 runs at 37.66)

The less said about that catch, the better – or about the second Test as a whole, really, where Denly succumbed cheaply to one of the better balls of the series. However, his efforts in the innings defeat at Mount Maunganui are worthy of recognition, in that he came about as close as any England batsman to meeting the cautious, crease-occupational demands of England’s new era. No-one truly believes that Denly is the answer to all of England’s problems, but he’s a senior player in this side by dint of his long county experience, and with five fifties in his last five Tests, he’s giving himself a chance to be the stop-gap that they so desperately need.

Joe Root (239 runs at 79.66)

No-one should doubt the value of Root’s extended net at Hamilton. Ten-and-a-half hours of crease occupation on the deadest of decks may not be definitive proof of an overdue return to form, but it gave him the in-game opportunity to iron out the flaws that have dogged his game all year long, particularly his balance at the crease which was notably more fluent by the end. And by then he had answered his critics in emphatic style at precisely the moment when the doubts about his captaincy were at their loudest. Arguably, his leadership from the front merely deferred that issue rather than quashing it – Root remains a grimly reactive leader whose win-loss ratio resembles a coin toss. But with the mounting exception of Rory Burns, there’s really no-one else in the squad remotely qualified for the role.

Rory Burns (184 runs at 61.33)

For the first time since Andrew Strauss and Alastair Cook were bankers at the top of the order, England are set to start and finish a calendar year with the same opening batsman in situ. It’s a fact that both underlines Burns’ achievement in bucking a trend that has devoured previously likely lads such as Adam Lyth, Mark Stoneman and (in seaming conditions at least…) Keaton Jennings, but also emphasises how small his sample size still remains. Nevertheless, it’s hard to quibble with a fifty and a century in consecutive Tests, even if he was monstrously fortunate to survive a messy third evening at Hamilton.

Steady as she goes

Ben Stokes (145 runs at 48.33; 2 wkts at 84.00)

Expectations are heightened for this year’s BBC Sports Personality-elect, and so the fact that he did not exceed them doesn’t mean that Stokes had an especially poor series. Nevertheless, he seemed in a bit of a bind as England’s new era began – he was seeing the ball so well at Mount Maunganui until a single mistake derailed England’s first innings, and thereafter he seemed reluctant to trust his fluency, as if uncomfortably aware of what would happen if he gave his wicket away again. His bowling was typically wholehearted but England’s attitude to his dodgy knee is terrifying.

Stuart Broad (4 wkts at 41.25)

We learnt nothing about Broad that we didn’t already know – which on the one hand is reassuring, for his four-wicket haul in the first innings at Hamilton was a real old pro’s performance: canny, patient and resilient, and evidence that he’s still got it as England embark on a new Test cycle. But he has started to become the fall guy for England overseas – he missed three of England’s six Tests in Sri Lanka and West Indies last winter – and if James Anderson and Mark Wood are fit for South Africa, there are no guarantees he won’t be squeezed again. It is, you could argue, a better problem to have than most.

Jos Buttler (43 runs at 21.50)

Caught in two minds like Stokes, but with extra jeopardy, given that there’s only room for one wicketkeeper, and Jonny Bairstow will be gunning for his gloves in South Africa. Buttler’s back injury in Hamilton was terrible timing in so many ways, for the suspicion is growing that No.7 is his only viable berth now that the Test team has pivoted towards old-school values – and if Bairstow finds form in South Africa, it’s hard to see how England make room for them both. Served up a handy rearguard in the first innings at Bay Oval, but his indecisive leave on the final day epitomised a team that is no longer sure whether to stick or twist.

Slipping off the pace

Jofra Archer (2 wkts at 104.50)

He’s not the messiah! But that might actually prove to be a blessing in the long term, given the unreasonable expectations that had been placed on Archer before the tour. He looked, more than anything, like a man in need of a rest – who can imagine how drained he was by that meteoric rise in England’s summer to end all summers. But he’ll have learnt a huge amount on this brief trip – about the Kookaburra ball, about overseas pitches, overseas crowds, and workload management. On the plus side, his variations were in full working order … even if his fielders weren’t.

Jack Leach (2 wkts at 76.50)

Irrespective of a bout of gastroenteritis that made his non-selection a moot point, Leach’s omission at Hamilton was a huge vote of no-confidence for the only specialist spinner since Graeme Swann to even remotely look the part. England missed him by the end of the match too – in his short Test career, he’s claimed 23 wickets at 20.26 in the third and fourth innings, so it’s not as if he’s been an abject failure in his primary role. But for whatever reason, England have seen fit to send a message that he’s not quite what they are looking for.

Dominic Sibley (38 runs at 12.66)

He’ll surely get another go in South Africa, because England prefer to give too many chances, not too few, but there wasn’t a whole lot of encouragement to be taken from Sibley’s initial forays in New Zealand. Granted, his first act in Test cricket was to play a part in a fifty-run opening stand, and England haven’t produced too many of those in recent times. But the manner in which he was twice clocked on the helmet – once in the Whangarei warm-up, once in the Hamilton Test – was a concern, especially on pitches this slow. Kagiso Rabada will doubtless have taken note, let alone Pat Cummins, Josh Hazlewood and Co.

Zak Crawley (1 run at 1.00)

One innings, six balls, one run, one nick-off to the keeper. What can you read into that? Next to nothing, especially as he’s surely going to be squeezed out for the South Africa tour, but at least he’s been blooded at Test level now. His fielding lacked a touch of co-ordination too, but at least he wore a smile in adversity (not least when his Kent team-mate Denly dropped that clanger).

Rising in absentia

Jonny Bairstow

His absence was felt when Buttler went lame, but to give the selectors their due, they were right to stick to their guns having chosen to drop Bairstow for the New Zealand Tests. It would have been easy to keep him on as cover when Denly rolled his ankle in the warm-ups, but that would have amounted to a pretty lame kick up the backside. After all, Bairstow has averaged 20.25 in his last nine Tests – a woeful return for a player of his talent. On the plus side, everyone knows what Jonny can do when he feels he’s got a point to prove.

James Anderson

Will his calf hold up? That’s the only concern as England prepare to welcome back their all-time leading wicket-taker. The ultimate takeaway from those dead-deck drubbings in New Zealand is that the attack sorely misses Anderson’s mastery of his craft – his relentless accuracy as much as his ability to make the new ball talk.

Mark Wood

He bowled like the wind in his last Test appearance, against West Indies in St Lucia in February, and having missed the Ashes with a side strain, he’ll be gagging to make up for lost time on the eve of what will be his 30th birthday in January. Injury management comes as part of the package where Wood is concerned, but like an over-eager spaniel, he rarely holds back in anticipation of another breakdown.

Moeen Ali

Is he ready to get back on the Test treadmill yet? Moeen sounded pretty ambivalent during the Abu Dhabi T10s last month, but Joe Root’s sweet-talking could hardly have been more earnest in the wake of the New Zealand Tests. He’s a team man, ultimately, and that will probably tip the balance.

Source link

Continue Reading


Recent Match Report – Tshwane Spartans vs Jozi Stars, Mzansi Super League, 25th Match



Match abandoned Tshwane Spartans v Jozi Stars

Tshwane Spartans had to settle for two points against Jozi Stars, which keeps them in third place on the MSL table, after their match was abandoned at SuperSport Park. This is the third time the Centurion-based side were unable to play at home, but the first where not a ball was bowled.

The Spartans faced 7.1 overs against Nelson Mandela Bay Giants on November 13, before the rain came down, and there were 17.1 overs played in their fixture against Durban Heat, which was eventually reduced to five overs on November 21, before play was no longer possible.

Those results affected the early part of the Spartans campaign, which left them with one win from their first three matches. They went on to two more victories against the Stars and Paarl Rocks before losing to the Giants and Cape Town Blitz to keep them off the top of the table. The Spartans are now two points behind the Giants and the Rocks and have one more match to play.

On the other end of the table, the defending champions Stars will welcome their first points after losing all seven matches so far. While they are out of contention for the playoff and will still end up with the wooden spoon, they have moved to two points instead of none and have two matches left to play.

Heavy rain on the South African Highveld is expected to last until Friday, bringing much needed relief from a heatwave and a severe drought. It should clear before the Stars play their final pool match against the Heat at the Wanderers on Saturday and the Spartans host the Blitz on Sunday afternoon, in what could be a decider to determine who makes the playoff.

Source link

Continue Reading


CSA loses second independent director as crisis snowballs



A second independent director has resigned from the Cricket South Africa board, deepening the crisis within its administration. Mohamed Iqbal Khan, who also acted as chairperson of the finance committee, stepped down on Wednesday evening alleging serious misconduct in the organisation, including credit card abuse.

On Tuesday, Professor Shirley Zinn resigned as an independent director citing problems with CSA’s “principles of corporate governance”.

Khan’s resignation letter, seen by ESPNcricinfo, points “all the fingers” at CEO Thabang Moroe, whom he accused of “bringing cricket into disrepute” given CSA’s current situation. The board’s problems at the moment include battles with the South African Cricketers’ Association (SACA), projected losses of at least R654 million (USD 44 million approx) for the next four-year cycle, a lack of sponsorship for the Mzansi Super League, the suspension of three senior members of staff, and delays in appointing the director of cricket.

“I cannot believe you are not aware of the many issues that have caused this malaise and to that extent, you are also complicit, and perhaps even the entire board. However, I can no longer be part of an organisation that is fast ruining the game,” Khan wrote.

Specifically, Khan appeared to agree with SACA, who had said Moroe was aware of the CSA’s non-payment to SACA for commercial rights during the 2018 MSL, something which SACA claimed when other CSA employees were suspended. Interim director of cricket Corrie van Zyl, COO Naasei Appiah and head of sales and sponsorship Clive Eksteen are currently facing disciplinary action for alleged dereliction of duty related to the year-long delay in payment to SACA, which both SACA and now Khan say Moroe was aware of.

Khan is also the first person to mention financial irregularities on the record, after several insiders claimed CSA’s expenses were running into the millions. In listing “some of the issues of concern to me”, Khan wrote: “CSA never paid the South African Cricketers’ Association a contractual amount in terms of a key stakeholder contract and the blame therefore was placed on three suspended employees despite the contract being signed by him [Moroe]”, and cited “widespread credit card abuse in the office” as another point of contention.

The CSA Board comprised 12 members – president Chris Nenzani, the six presidents from the affiliated provinces – Beresford Williams, Zola Thamae, Tebogo Siko, Donovan May, Jack Madiseng and Angelo Carolissen – and five independent directors, namely Khan, Zinn, Dawn Mokhobo, Steve Cornelius and Marius Schoeman CS. Now it is down to 10. The inclusion of independent members came in 2012 after Gerald Majola was forced out because of the 2009 IPL bonus scandal.

Khan’s letter also revealed that CSA were due to hold a board meeting on Tuesday, which was postponed to Saturday. More resignations are expected before then.

Meanwhile, a second sponsor has also spoken out about their “grave concerns,” for the way CSA is currently being run. After Standard Bank demanded a meeting with CSA on Monday, the Willowton Group, whose product Sunfoil is well known to South African cricket fans as the title sponsor in Test series until last summer, also issued a statement as they remain involved in development cricket. The Willowton Group was particularly strident in their support for the suspended trio, with whom they worked closely.

“During our tenure as headline sponsor to the international test series and 4-day domestic series, we valued the relationships that were created with past and current players, that were both active in the game and administration. Their passion for the game of cricket and good governance created an environment that allowed the national team and fellow South Africans to focus on the game out on the pitch and not the side games that are so prevalent today. These same passionate individuals have been cast out of the organisation and suspended without real cause or substantiation,” the group said in a statement.

The Willowton Group called for the immediate reinstatement of van Zyl, Appiah and Eksteen as well as Khan and Zinn to the board and immediate resignation of Moroe and president Chris Nenzani.

CSA are expected to make big decisions at their board meeting on Saturday.

1530 SAST: Article was updated with The Willowton Group’s statement

Source link

Continue Reading