Connect with us


DLS explainer: Why Kings XI had to chase just 125



Kolkata Knight Riders’ Dinesh Karthik said after the game that he couldn’t understand how an asking rate of eight an over before the rain break came down to a run a ball after the interruption. (Kings XI Punjab needed 96 from 11.4 overs, at a rate of 8.23, before the break, and 29 from 28 when they resumed.) How does Duckworth-Lewis-Stern (DLS) explain this?

The DLS method only takes into account three factors when calculating a target:

The runs scored at the time of the break is immaterial. This is because it works on the basis of opportunity-cost of the overs lost to the batting team due to the interruption: the runs already scored do not come into the equation.

In this case, Kings XI Punjab lost seven overs with ten wickets in hand; they had the potential to score many more runs compared to a case where they would have lost seven overs with, say, only three wickets in hand. DLS recognises this and allocates a certain percentage of resources lost by the batting team due to this interruption. The target is then reduced by the same percentage.

How was the calculation performed in this case?

Given the stage at which Kings XI lost those seven overs, and the fact that they had all ten wickets in hand, DLS calculated that they lost about 35% of their run-scoring potential. Hence, the revised target was about 65% of their original target. The target of 125 would have remained the same even if they had been 50 without loss or 75 without loss. If they had been 75 for no wicket, they would have required 50 off the last 28 balls, which would have been a much tougher ask.

Thus Kings XI got the benefit of being way ahead of par score – which was 65 without loss – at the time of the break.

How would the target have been different if Kings XI had lost more wickets, or if the seven-over break would have happened at the different stage of their innings?

The difference would have been marginal if Kings XI had lost one or two wickets – 127 if they had been one down, and 129 if two – but had they been 96 for 4 at the time it rained, the revised target would have been 140, which would have meant 44 more runs in 28 balls. The fact that they racked up so many runs without losing any wickets helped them hugely.

If the seven-over interruption had happened just two overs into the innings, then Kings XI’s target would have been 136 (with all wickets in hand). However, had it rained after 11 overs instead of 8.2, and the same number of overs had been lost, the revised target would have been 117 (with all wickets in hand). That’s because, according to DLS calculations, the opportunity-cost of a break early in the innings is lesser than one that happens during the later stages of an innings.

Karthik also mentioned that the VJD method – an alternative rain-rule system devised by V Jayadevan, which is used in Indian domestic cricket – should be used in the IPL. Would there have been a different target had VJD been used here?

No, the VJD target in this case would also have been exactly the same – 125. The 8.2 over par score according to that method, though, was 71; DLS calculated it as 65. Incidentally, the VJD method also doesn’t look at the runs scored at the time of the interruption, so the situation for Karthik and for KKR would have been exactly the same regardless of which system was in use.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


PCB vs PSL franchise owners



The PCB was “surprised and disappointed” by the decision of the six PSL franchises to seek legal action in a bid to get the financial model of the T20 league changed. The board’s counsel told Lahore High Court that the franchises’ writ petition “was misdirected and was liable to be dismissed” as the proper mechanism for resolving any dispute between the PCB and the franchises is “through initiation of arbitration”.

The franchise owners approached the court with the claim that the PSL has made the PCB richer while the franchises have run into losses every season, and asked in the petition for the court to direct the PCB to “formally redress the grievances of all franchises” and “revise the model of PSL in accordance with its statutory mandate and make it financially viable”.

The PCB’s legal team was in court on Friday, present before Justice Sajid Mahmood Sethi, and “received notices for hearing in respect of the Writ Petition filed by the six franchise owners, fixed today as an Urgent Petition”, according to a PCB statement.

Taffazul Rizvi, the PCB’s counsel, objected to the “maintainability” of the petition, pointing to the dispute resolution protocols, and informed the judge “that the PCB had twice this week invited the franchise owners to meet and discuss the financial model for HBL Pakistan Super League with a view towards redressing grievances in good faith”.

“The PCB remains committed to working with its partners, but in this matter, it is surprised and disappointed that despite its offers to engage in discussions over the financial model and whilst being aware of the appropriate forum for dispute resolution, the franchisees approached the Honourable High Court”

PCB statement

The franchises, meanwhile, have contended that they have met with the PCB on more than one occasion to discuss the matter, but nothing concrete has emerged from those interactions. The issue reared its head when the board was late in distributing the franchises’ share of the revenue generated during the 2019 PSL. This led to all six owners refusing to submit their bank guarantees, a key part of the petition.

“The PCB remains committed to working with its partners, but in this matter, it is surprised and disappointed that despite its offers to engage in discussions over the financial model and whilst being aware of the appropriate forum for dispute resolution, the franchisees approached the Honourable High Court,” the PCB statement said. “The PCB looks forward to addressing all queries and legal-objections before the Honourable Court and then to find solutions that are practicable and acceptable to all parties involved.”

The PCB will submit its written comments by September 30, the next date of the hearing, on the court’s instructions.

Seeking redressal in court is a culmination of long-running frustration for the franchises about the league’s financial model. Franchises have argued for tax exemptions, a better distribution of gate money and better exchange rate terms. No franchise has broken even in the first four full seasons of the league, and the addition of an extra franchise – the Multan Sultans – has lessened everyone’s share from the central pool the PCB has set up for revenue.

The PCB has insisted that once the league moves back to Pakistan properly then not only will the franchises be able to move towards breaking even but it will also generate “higher economic activity in the country”. This season – the league’s fifth – was the first to be fully played in Pakistan, but it was hit by the Covid-19 crisis. Four matches of the playoffs could not be played and have been rescheduled for November behind closed doors.

Source link

Continue Reading


England women v West Indies 2020



Heather Knight has implored England to “put a show on” in Saturday’s third T20I against West Indies, as her side face the dual incentives of sealing the five-match series with two to play and showcasing women’s international cricket live on free-to-air TV.

2-0 up in the series after 47-run wins in both of their first fixtures since the T20 World Cup in March, England have been dominant despite not yet stringing together a complete performance. In the first match, they added only 31 runs in the final five overs to stumble to 163, while in the second nobody made a defining contribution: the top score with the bat was Sarah Glenn‘s 26 from No. 8, while none of the bowlers took three wickets.

“I think we haven’t played our best cricket yet,” Knight admitted on Friday, “but we’re still winning well and still posting 150+ despite probably not fulfilling our potential as a batting line-up yet. We haven’t had many people go on.

“The other night, we had lots of starts but nobody went on to get that really big score which we know wins a large percentage of games. We’re obviously looking to do that. The pitch was a little bit slower so they went a bit wider, which we probably didn’t adapt to well enough, but yeah, we’re hopeful that we’ll get some runs on the board.”

ALSO READ: ‘I want to be a genuine allrounder’ – Glenn

While they are yet to put in a perfect performance, England will be buoyed by the visibility that this series has received. The third T20I will be broadcast live on the BBC – the first women’s fixture to be shown on terrestrial TV in the UK since the 1993 World Cup final – but the series has already been afforded broad coverage: Sky have made their feed available without charge on YouTube, Test Match Special has broadcast from the ground, and ESPNcricinfo has provided ball-by-ball commentary throughout.

Knight suggested that there had been “a bigger buzz around training” on Friday morning, despite the cold Derby weather, in the knowledge that Saturday’s game will be seen by a bigger audience than usual, and highlighted opener Danni Wyatt as a player who would use additional visibility as a motivation.

“This is the most visible bilateral series we’ve ever had, which is amazing,” Knight said. “Sky have been a great broadcast partner and have shown all the games free on YouTube, but to have that prime slot on the BBC is only going to increase the reach that we have. Hopefully we can put on a brilliant performance.

“[Wyatt] loves the buzz of T20 cricket and the buzz of having people to show what she can do. She’s had good signs in the first two games and hasn’t really gone on, [but] hopefully she can go out and impress tomorrow.”

ALSO READ: Making cricket more inclusive would be a small positive from Covid – Knight

And Knight also played down concerns that with West Indies looking rusty and struggling to score fluently in the series so far, Saturday’s game might lack something in terms of a spectacle.

“It doesn’t concern me,” she said. “Our job is to win games of cricket, which we’ve been doing. The West Indies have had a little bit of a break: not many of them were training before they came over here, so that needs to be taken into account a little bit.

“I think [the second T20I] threatened to be a really good game when Deandra [Dottin] and Stafanie [Taylor] were building that partnership – we did really feel under pressure. In the first game, when Deandra was there, we always felt that they could make a game of it because we know the hitting potential she does have.

“As a side we’ve executed really well, particularly with the ball, and managed to keep them quiet. Hopefully we can continue to do that. From a captain’s point of view, in terms of the growth of the team, you want to see the girls put under pressure as much as possible, but we’re doing our job very well at the moment, and will look to continue to do that.”

Source link

Continue Reading


Chennai Super Kings vs Delhi Capitals, live streaming, where to watch CSK vs DC, IPL 2020, 7.30pm, Sep 25



There is a raging debate over the Chennai Super Kings captain MS Dhoni pushing himself down the order, and while he isn’t the type to respond to them, the Delhi Capitals may well be happy that all the focus is on their opposition. The Capitals have a strong core of young Indian batsmen and a strike bowler who basically rejects the concept of pressure. Maybe, just maybe, that’s enough to secure what will be only their third victory over the Super Kings since 2013.

Chennai Super Kings vs Delhi Capitals is available to view in India on Disney+ Hotstar, Jio TV and Airtel TV.

When does the CSK vs DC live streaming start?
The CSK vs DC live streaming will start at 7:00 PM India Time September 25, 2020.

Where is the CSK vs DC match being played?
CSK vs DC match will be played at Dubai International Cricket Stadium, Dubai in the UAE.

On which TV channels will CSK vs DC live coverage be available?
In India, Star Sports 1 and 1HD, Star Sports Select 1 and 1HD and SS1 Hindi and 1 Hindi HD will have live coverage of CSK vs DC, IPL 2020 on September 25, 2020.

Where can one find CSK vs DC live score and commentary online?
The fastest and most comprehensive live score and details will be available here: CSK vs DC live score.

What are the likely playing XIs for today’s CSK vs DC game?

Chennai Super Kings: 1 Shane Watson, 2 Faf du Plessis, 3 Ruturaj Gaikwad, 4 Sam Curran, 5 Kedar Jadhav, 6 Ravindra Jadeja, 7 MS Dhoni (capt & wk), 8 Deepak Chahar, 9 Shardul Thakur/Karn Sharma, 10 Piyush Chawla, 11 Lungi Ngidi/Imran Tahir

Delhi Capitals: 1 Prithvi Shaw, 2 Shikhar Dhawan, 3 Shimron Hetmyer, 4 Shreyas Iyer (capt), 5 Rishabh Pant (wk), 6 Marcus Stoinis, 7 Axar Patel, 8 R Ashwin/Amit Mishra, 9 Kagiso Rabada, 10 Anrich Norje, 11 Mohit Sharma

Who are the captains for today’s CSK vs DC game?
The captains for today’s game will be MS Dhoni (CSK) and Shreyas Iyer (DC).

Who are the umpires for CSK vs DC game?
The umpires for today’s game will be Richard Illingworth and KN Ananthapadmanabhan. The third umpire will be K Srinivasan.

Who will be the match referee for CSK vs DC game?
The match referee for today’s game will be V Narayan Kutty.

All telecast and streaming timings are according to information received from the host broadcaster.

Source link

Continue Reading