Last season, the Colorado Rockies scored 824 runs. According to the runs created formula in the Bill James Handbook, they should have scored 798. The 26-run discrepancy, which worked to Colorado’s favor, was surpassed in the National League only by the 28-run overage by the Chicago Cubs. The Rockies and the Cubs were the two most efficient offenses in the league.
Why did Colorado outperform the algorithms so dramatically? It’s hard to say. Often, the answer lies in sequencing. In other words, the Rockies might have not just collected a lot of hits, but they also tended to get those hits at the right time. That might explain Colorado’s offensive efficiency, which isn’t to be confused with proficiency. In fact, after you adjust for the pinball effects of Coors Field, the Rockies were a below-average offensive unit. However, they led the league in percentage of baserunners knocked in (OBI%), according to Baseball Prospectus. Good sequencing seems the most likely explanation for a run total that wasn’t quite supported by its underlying categories.
That brings us to some comments uttered to reporters last week by Rockies manager Bud Black. It’s unclear why the subject came up, but Black was asked about the possibility of using shortstop Trevor Story as a cleanup hitter. According to Baseball-Reference.com, the Rockies’ team OPS in that slot, as compared to the overall team OPS, was the worst in the National League. Story, who hit just .239 and led the league with 191 strikeouts, seems to be an unlikely candidate to improve that performance.
Here’s what Black told the Denver Post: “Avoiding the strikeout, putting the ball in play, self-admitted [Story] wasn’t good at that early in the year. So he’s got to get to that point. The guys who do knock in runs, the guys who do get it done in situations, those guys put the ball in play. That’s where the challenge is for him and the improvement we’re talking about.”
The italics in that quote were added for emphasis. Black might have simply been pointing out that excessive strikeouts are not what you want in RBI situations or, even more fundamentally, that a good hitter is preferable to a bad hitter. You might also interpret the suggestion like this: High-contact hitters are more desirable in RBI situations than low-contact hitters.
That conclusion seems evident on the face of it. If you have two hitters of roughly equal bottom-line value, it seems to follow that the better contact guy would do better in RBI spots than a player who strikes out a lot, even if those whiffs are accompanied by a lot of walks and home runs. But is that really the case? If so, how much should managers try to wedge a contact hitter into the cleanup spot, even given differing levels of ability?
A couple of the usual statements need to be made here. First, if you’ve paid any attention to the research-based concepts that have emerged in baseball over the past four decades, then you probably know that when it comes to lineup construction, the names in the batting order are way more important than the order they are listed in.
That isn’t to suggest, as you might read from time to time, that lineup construction is meaningless. To illustrate, check out this result from the intensely addictive lineup optimizer tool at BaseballMusings.com. This features arguably the best nine position players in baseball last season. (We’re not worried about defensive position here, so if Joey Votto is catching, don’t be shocked, and this lineup doesn’t include a pitcher.) It’s a great lineup: Over the course of the season, it would average 7.59 runs per game, according to that tool.
The optimum order of those great players, if used every game, would yield 7.67 runs per game. The least optimum would still get you 7.31. Over 162 games, the net difference between the best and worst lineups is about 58 runs, but of course there is no scenario in which a manager would trot out his nine best hitters 162 times and purposefully align them in the least efficient manner each day. So we’re talking about 10 to 15 runs between the average order and the optimal order.
In other words, lineup order matters. But it doesn’t matter enough to justify the amount of ink spilled debating it. Ironically, there are few topics around the day-to-day discussion of baseball that are more fun to debate than lineup construction. It’s tough to avoid, even when you’ve comprehended the marginal stakes at play.
The fourth spot in the batting order does come up to the plate with runners on base more than any other lineup slot. That means this cleanup descriptor isn’t based on nothing. According to “The Book,” the fourth slot is the only spot in the order that comes up with runners on base at least half the time, on average. So there is a reason you would want your best RBI guy — however that is defined — hitting in that spot, unless your optimal lineup would require that batter to hit first or second.
There have been quite a few studies (here’s one) that illustrate one important variable to consider here, which is that hitters as a group become more aggressive in RBI spots. Not all do, and a criticism that has historically been lobbed at even great-but-patient hitters — from Ted Williams to Barry Bonds to Votto — is that they won’t often expand the zone in RBI spots. The defense of that approach is that doing so would over the long haul result in more harm than good, if only because such an altered approach can lead to bad habits. Who can really argue with their results? But some hitters who might be disciplined overall take a turn toward aggression when the situation is warranted.
To look at some of these topics, we grabbed five years’ worth of hitting data from TruMedia and filtered out players who did not compile at least 300 plate appearances overall, with a minimum of 100 opportunities with runners in scoring position. There were 555 such players. For our purposes, we’re using performance with runners in scoring position (RISP) as a kind of proxy for RBI ability, even though it’s a lot more complicated than that. But because we’re specifically wondering about RBI opportunities, this designation will suffice.
From there, we rated the players for “clutchiness” (wOBA with runners in scoring position as compared to usual performance), patience, contact ability and bottom-line performance (as measured by wOBA). The method for calculating these ratings is a little weedsy, but the data behind them include things such as swing percentage, contacts-per-swing and chase rate.
Finally, we subdivided our overall group of 555 players into groups in a variety of ways — for contact, patience, clutchiness, wOBA, etc., and further divided the groups into more groups, according to proficiency in the various categories, with each rating sorted into a high, medium or low tier. With this approach, we can describe hitters as, for example, medium quality/high contact/low patience. There are a lot of combinations, but we’ll share a few observations from the exercise.
1. Patience. The more patient a hitter is, the more he is apt to improve his wOBA in RBI spots, but the numbers are marginal. The most patient group improved its collective wOBA by 0.7 percent with runners in scoring position. The middle group improved by 0.5, and the least patient group lost 0.3 percent of its wOBA. Small percentages, to be sure. But still, if you can put a more patient hitter in the cleanup spot than a less patient hitter, you should probably do so.
2. Contact. These data were a little more counterintuitive. The highest contact group improved its wOBA by 0.5 percent in RBI spots. But the medium group not only improved by more — 1.1 percent — but also was best in overall RISP (.337 wOBA vs. .324 for the high-contact group). Why is that? The answer would require some investigation, but perhaps the high-contact guys have more soft contact and/or hit into more double plays.
3. Medium-contact guys. Since that group stood out, we subdivided that group according to patience. The results here were interesting. Medium-contact hitters with a high degree of patience improved their wOBA by 1.6 percent in clutch spots. So, too, did medium-contact hitters with medium degrees of patience. However, the more patient group posted a whopping .350 wOBA in RBI spots, compared with .337 for the other group. This is the subgroup you’d most like to see cleanup hitters come from.
4. Caveat. The numbers are marginal enough that you would need to be careful interpreting them. That is, lineup optimization analysis tells us that you want to get your best hitters high in the order so they can get more opportunities than their lesser colleagues. So, for example, let’s say Kris Bryant looked like an ideal cleanup hitter, according to this study. He’s the Cubs’ best overall hitter and to hit him second, as the Cubs usually do, is probably the best use of his talents. He’s got too much power for leadoff, where players don’t hit as much with runners on base, but the 2-hole gets him to the plate most often, and if the leadoff guy is a good one, he’ll get plenty of chances with runners on base. The optimal lineup should see a team’s three best hitters being used in the first, second and fourth spots. The first slot favors on-base ability, the second spot is likely the team’s best all-around hitter, and the No. 4 hitter is another one of the team’s top hitters and power threats, and has the traits we’re describing here.
This might fly into the face of convention a bit, with the traditional idea being that your best overall hitter should bat third. But studies have shown that isn’t necessarily the case, largely because No. 3 hitters come to the plate with two outs and the bases empty more often than other lineup spots. But you still want a quality hitter in the 3-hole.
When applying these observations to our data pool, who emerges as a cleanup candidate? To come up with some names, we hit the data with these filters: high wOBA, high patience, medium contact and high clutchiness. This last filter was used to identify hitters with a track record of performing better in RISP spots than they do overall.
Finally, given the general principle that the teams’ best all-around hitter goes into the 2-hole, we filtered out the hitters projected to be the team’s best overall hitter. After all of this filtering, was there anybody left? Yes! Five players survived the process, a nice round number you’ve got to love:
Mitch Haniger, Seattle Mariners: Haniger is coming off his rookie season, so his sample is on the smaller end of the spectrum. So far in his big league career, Haniger has a .364 wOBA with runners in scoring position vs. .357 overall. He falls in the top tiers in both performance and patience and is in the medium tier in terms of contact, though his score in that category was 2 percent better than league average. The Mariners, of course have, some proven RBI guys on hand in Nelson Cruz, Robinson Cano and Kyle Seager, so for Scott Servais to install Haniger as his No. 4 hitter would raise some eyebrows. For what it’s worth, Haniger’s patience and contact factors drop precipitously in RISP situations. He’s a player who expands the zone when runs are at stake, and so far, it’s an approach that has worked for him.
Russell Martin, Toronto Blue Jays: Martin is one of the most disciplined hitters in the game. He, too, expands the zone in RBI spots, but his contract rate actually skyrockets. His wOBA with runners in scoring position has been .345 over the past five seasons, six points better than his overall rate. This is one veteran who should keep doing what he’s doing.
Shin-soo Choo, Texas Rangers: Choo is good for a .368 wOBA in RBI spots versus .360 overall. Like Haniger, he falls below average in patience in RISP spots but maintains an above-average contact rate.
Tommy Pham, St. Louis Cardinals: Pham has a sparkling .391 wOBA in RBI spots so far in his career, compared to .384 overall. That’s good stuff. His plate discipline indicators are off the charts. Like Martin, he remains well above average in patience with runners on base. But unlike Martin, Pham’s contact rate tumbles, though he was just below average overall. The bottom line is Pham looks like a big-time RBI guy, though you have to wonder whether the contact rate will portend some volatility.
Eugenio Suarez, Cincinnati Reds: Suarez’s numbers in this study were amazing. His wOBA in RBI spots is .364. Good stuff. Overall, though, it’s .336, giving him one of the highest clutchiness factors in baseball. He’s just above average in patience in RISP spots and even a little better in contact. However, like Martin and Choo, he’s better at putting the bat on the ball with runners on the line than overall.
But what about Trevor Story? Well, with a career .359 wOBA, he falls into the high-performer tier despite his strikeout-laden 2017 campaign. But he has been less than clutch, losing 26 points off that wOBA with runners on base. His patience factor falls in the medium tier. And as you likely have guessed, his contact rate is in the low tier. In other words, unless Story greatly improves his bat-to-ball skills, he isn’t a good candidate to bat cleanup for the Rockies or anyone else.
Still, let’s give Bud Black some props. The analysis does suggest that a little heightened aggression, as long as it maintains a foot in the realm of selectivity, can pay off in RBI situations. Batters: With runners on base, expand the zone and don’t let those fastballs go by. But don’t get carried away.
After five straight series losses, the Los Angeles Dodgers are looking for answers
They were built for unprecedented greatness, a pursuit only strengthened by a blistering start. But now, 5½ weeks into their season as reigning champions, the Los Angeles Dodgers are basically average. An initial 13-2 record has been followed by 15 losses in a stretch of 20 games, a stunning reversal that has the Dodgers at 18-17 while occupying the No. 3 spot of a division they have dominated for most of the past decade.
“I’m pissed, personally,” Dodgers starter Trevor Bauer said after a 2-1 loss to the crosstown rival Los Angeles Angels on Sunday afternoon. “I freakin’ hate losing. I wanna win. That’s why I came here. We are not playing up to our capability right now.”
After Bauer left a curveball slightly up to Angels first baseman Jared Walsh with the bases loaded and two outs in the third inning — a pitch that resulted in a two-run double — Bauer retired 10 in a row to keep the game close. But the visiting Dodgers only scored a single run all outing in support. They put the leadoff runner on in the fifth, sixth and seventh and came up empty each time. While still down a run in the ninth, they put two runners on base with one out for Justin Turner, their best hitter this season, and lost anyway.
The Dodgers have lost five consecutive series for the first time since the stretch run of the 2017 regular season, when they cruised to a massive division lead and seemed bored for most of the second half. They’ve gone 5-15 for the first time since the early portion of the 2018 regular season, when they suffered through what several players described as the proverbial World Series hangover.
Dodgers utility man Chris Taylor said the team is “too talented for it not to turn around,” a notion demonstrated by a plus-32 run-differential — first in the National League. But the root of their struggle is difficult to identify. The Dodgers haven’t been hitting to their capabilities, but they haven’t been hitting poorly. Their starting pitching has fallen off a tad, but it has been a strength nonetheless. Their bullpen has been short-handed, but it hasn’t necessarily imploded.
The Dodgers have been hurt mostly by an inability to match their hitting with their pitching on the same day. They’ve also played a lot of weird games, with this week serving as a prime example.
The Dodgers dropped both ends of a doubleheader from Wrigley Field on Tuesday after Clayton Kershaw struggled through the first inning of Game 1 and the bullpen blew a late, two-run lead in Game 2. The following day, they took leads in the 10th and 11th and still lost. They returned to Southern California, enjoyed a day off and then prepared to face an Angels team that had lost four straight. It felt as if the Dodgers might finally break out again. But on Friday, two of their most important pitchers (Julio Urias and Joe Kelly) each gave up four-run innings. On Saturday, the Dodgers took a 13-0 lead and nearly gave it all up. And on Sunday, they went 1-for-11 with runners in scoring position.
“You can say it’s early, and you can say there’s no need to panic and you can say all these things — and they’re all true,” Bauer said. “But at the end of the day, we’re not just gonna roll the bats and balls out there and win baseball games. We’re not just gonna sleepwalk our way to winning another division title and going to the World Series again. That’s not how it works.
“You gotta go out there and beat someone, every single day. And we haven’t been good at it. We have to be better.”
The Dodgers have lost a major league-leading 10 games by one run. Dodgers manager Dave Roberts wasn’t quite sure how to interpret that, but he struck an optimistic tone postgame on Sunday. He credited the at-bat quality in the series finale and constantly alluded to how close his team seems to turning a corner.
Still, he admitted that other players share Bauer’s anger.
“There’s no complacency.” Roberts said. “Guys are grinding. That’s who we are. But at the end of the day, it’s a performance game. We’re better than this, and we expect to win baseball games considerably more than we lose. He has every right to be upset, and he’s not alone in that.”
The Dodgers aren’t whole, of course. Cody Bellinger, the National League’s Most Valuable Player in 2019, hasn’t played since April 5. Two key bench players, Zach McKinstry and Edwin Rios, reside on the injured list. Dustin May has opted for season-ending Tommy John surgery. Tony Gonsolin — May’s replacement in the fifth spot of the rotation — is still working his way back. And three crucial relievers are currently recovering from injuries, a list that includes Corey Knebel, Brusdar Graterol and David Price.
But the Dodgers haven’t fallen too far behind in the NL West. They sit 2½ games back of the surprising San Francisco Giants and 1½ games back of the San Diego Padres, with nearly 80% of the season remaining.
Roberts claims he hasn’t even looked at the standings. He doesn’t believe he needs to.
“We’re gonna be at the top of this division,” Roberts said. “I have no doubt in my mind.”
St. Louis Cardinals’ Nolan Arenado homers in win over Rockies, says playing former team was ‘definitely weird’
Yadier Molina hit an RBI double, and Ryan Helsley got Josh Fuentes to ground into a game-ending double play with the bases loaded. St. Louis completed a three-game sweep and has won nine of 11 overall.
Arenado was acquired from the Rockies in a blockbuster trade in early February after the star third baseman spent the first eight years of his career with Colorado.
He said it felt strange playing against his old teammates during the weekend series.
“It was definitely weird,” Arenado said. “Obviously, I know a lot of those guys. At the end of the day, it was a great series to win.”
Arenado has reached safely in 18 of the past 20 games. His mom, Millie, was in attendance on Mother’s Day, which made the home run even more enjoyable.
“It’s just great to have moments like that with your family,” St. Louis manager Mike Shildt said. “That’s what life is all about. These are magic moments that people will cherish for a long time.”
Wainwright (2-3) struck out five and walked three over 8⅓ innings, improving to 11-1 against the Rockies. He retired nine batters in a row at one point and eight straight during another stretch.
The 39-year-old right-hander fell two outs short of his 11th career shutout. His last one came in 2016. The veteran simply keeps plugging along.
“I can’t even tell you how much younger I feel than when I was 36, 37. It’s just not even close,” Wainwright said. “I have a great time outperforming expectations.”
Molina and Wainwright have made 279 starts together, which ranks them sixth all-time.
“This guy amazes me every time he takes the mound,” Molina said.
Helsley earned his second major league save and first this season.
Arenado homered leading off the second against German Marquez (1-4), who allowed two runs, one earned, in six innings. Marquez struck out six and walked three.
Molina added a run-scoring double in the fourth.
St. Louis improved to 14-4 since April 23, the best record in the majors during that span.
The Rockies have lost 22 games — 13 by two runs or fewer — and dropped to a major league-worst 2-14 on the road.
“There were a couple situational at-bats where we didn’t get it done early in the game,” Colorado manager Bud Black said. “And then again we didn’t get the big hit there in the ninth. We just couldn’t cash in.”
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Atlanta Braves add some bullpen depth, bring back veteran Shane Greene on a one-year contract
ATLANTA — Relief pitcher Shane Greene has signed a one-year contract to rejoin the Atlanta Braves.
Greene, who was optioned to Triple-A Gwinnett, will need some time to get ready before returns to the majors. The right-hander went 1-0 with a 2.60 ERA and 21 strikeouts in 27 2/3 innings last season.
Braves relievers began Sunday with a 4.56 ERA that ranked 22nd in the majors. It’s a considerable slip from last year when the bullpen ranked fourth with a 3.50 ERA.
“He showed the benefit in the role he assumed in that very strong bullpen last year,” manager Brian Snitker said before the game when the deal was not yet official. “There’s a guy that’s willing and able to do pretty much any role in that bullpen. He came to me last year when we had all the starting woes and guys were down and said, `I’ll start games if you want me to.’ He’s a durable guy. He had a very solid year. If and when we get him back here, I’ll be excited to get him in the mix.”
The Braves are expected to get reliever Chris Martin back on Tuesday. He has missed the last 29 games with right shoulder inflammation.
“These guys have done a great job this last week,” Snitker said of his relievers. “They’ve been very big in that series in Washington and last night what those guys did, they’ve done a really strong job here, handing the ball off to each other and what they’ve done, but if you add guys like that, absolutely, it’s going to help strengthen the bullpen.”
Atlanta originally acquired Greene in a three-player trade with the Detroit Tigers on July 31, 2019, and he has pitched 55 games for the Braves over the last two seasons, going 1-1 with a 3.27 ERA and one save.
Greene allowed seven runs over his first six appearances with Atlanta after being acquired in 2019, but in his last 49 games for the club dating to August 14 of that season he has allowed just 12 runs over 48.0 innings for a 2.25 ERA and 38 strikeouts.
Cricket6 days ago
Bangladesh cricket – Former BCB president Kamal Ziaul Islam dies aged 86
Motorsport6 days ago
F1 2021, Spanish Grand Prix: Oscar Piastri wants to join Daniel Ricciardo in the top flight next year
MLB6 days ago
Los Angeles Dodgers’ Dustin May to undergo Tommy John surgery
Cricket5 days ago
IPL 2021 – Delhi Capitals
Cricket7 days ago
SL v Bangladesh 2021 – Failed to plan against specific bowlers
Cricket6 days ago
Hampshire sign Colin de Grandhomme for second half of T20 Blast
Motorsport7 days ago
IndyCar 2021, news, results, Scott McLaughlin, crash, Texas, video, highlights,
Boxing6 days ago
Billy Joe Saunders vs Canelo Alvarez fight OFF claims Tom Saunders after ring size feud